Simulated scenario · Actual system output
Regulated enterprise AI agent launch
A nine-month launch shaped by a regulator, two enterprise clients, security, legal and risk, procurement, and a model provider.
Snapshot generated 2026-09-28
Complete generated tree: three end states, six paths, 21 nodes, and three semantic merge groups. The regulator's sandbox acceptance is a shared first gate across all paths. Probabilities are scenario estimates, not observed frequencies.
Regulated enterprise AI agent launch
Outcomes and paths
Regulator-approved dual-client governed launch
Both clients enter production with enforceable controls and a staged provider contract.
Path 1
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Agree staged one-year provider commitment
Procurement replaces the proposed three-year minimum with compliance and demand gates.
- Model-risk review closes with no mandatory remediation
Security, privacy, legal, and risk provide a complete enforceable-control file.
- Both clients approve production; call volume falls at least 20%
The shared production outcome uses client-specific residency, bank-owned escalation, and auditable controls.
Path 2
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Co-develop client-specific residency and escalation schedules
The bank drafts enforceable client terms in parallel with the regulatory evidence file.
- Model-risk review closes with no mandatory remediation
Security, privacy, legal, and risk provide a complete enforceable-control file.
- Both clients approve production; call volume falls at least 20%
The shared production outcome uses client-specific residency, bank-owned escalation, and auditable controls.
Regulator-approved restricted one-client launch
One client enters limited production while the second remains in a non-production pilot.
Path 1
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Prove one client's enforceable controls first
Legal, risk, security, and privacy prioritize the client whose terms can be enforced in time.
- Review authorizes production for exactly one client
The second client's unresolved terms keep it out of production.
- Approved client goes live with capped volume
The provider remains month-to-month while the second client stays in pilot.
Path 2
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Legal and risk ring-fence the second client early
The bank deliberately keeps the unresolved client in a non-production pilot.
- Review permits restricted one-client production
The regulator accepts evidence for the first client only.
- One client goes live; second stays in pilot
The limited launch preserves a reversible commercial commitment.
Remediation ordered and program stopped
Unresolved control and commercial gaps stop production for both clients.
Path 1
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Model-risk review issues mandatory remediation findings
Gaps in auditability, bias evidence, incident ownership, liability, and residency block production.
- Reject three-year provider minimum while remediation remains open
Procurement and finance remove the commercial basis for continuing the current plan.
- Bank records program stop; no client reaches production
Unresolved remediation, blocked approval, and failed commercial terms end the program.
Path 2
- Regulator formally accepts controlled-sandbox protocol
Written acceptance of the evidence protocol is the shared gate before every later path.
- Dual-client residency conflict blocks joint evidence package
The bank cannot certify one enforceable control set for both clients.
- Review ties mandatory remediation to residency and controls
The unresolved residency conflict prevents a defensible production approval.
- Bank records program stop; no client reaches production
The bank pauses for a narrower restart or a different platform.